可借阅:*
图书馆 | 资料类型 | 排架号 | 子计数 | 书架位置 | 状态 | 图书预约 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
正在检索... Central | Book | 959.704 TOLLEFSON | 1 | Non-fiction Collection | 正在检索... 未知 | 正在检索... 不可借阅 |
正在检索... Central | Book | 959.70 TOL | 1 | Non-fiction Collection | 正在检索... 未知 | 正在检索... 不可借阅 |
链接这些题名
已订购
评论 (3)
出版社周刊评论
Vietnam-era conscientious objectors here tell how they came to the wrenching decision to refuse the draft or, if they were already in the military, why they decided not to bear arms. The men discuss their strained relations with family members (emphasis on father-son anger), their confrontations with draft boards, their traumatic experiences in prison. Those who performed alternative service in the Peace Corps or as hospital aides recount problems they faced. Many of the men in this absorbing book fled to Canada to live a fugitive life throughout the war, several staying on to become Canadian citizens. Finally, the objectors describe their efforts to come to terms with their families, with their country and with their own consciences after the war. Most impressively, not one of the participants in this oral history believes he did the wrong thing. Tollefson is an English professor at the University of Washington. (July) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Kirkus评论
Why one group of young men chose not to go to war, as told in their own words. By interviewing only conscientious objectors who took a legal route to evade the Vietnam War rather than those who simply dodged the draft, Tollefson (English/University of Washington) defuses the sort of hindsight criticism that threatened to derail Bill Clinton's campaign. The author's ``sample'' is broad, though not scientific, and includes a Roman Catholic seminarian; sons of men who served with distinction in WW II; leftists; conservatives; Jews; Lutherans--nearly every kind of American male to be found at the time. Twenty-odd years after the event, these men's words tend to share a detached tranquility--one to some extent depersonalized because no names or even pseudonyms are attached to the oral testimony, preventing readers from following the development of any one particular case. The excerpts are arranged chronologically-- some as short as a paragraph, others several pages long--and grouped into five sections: ``Deciding Not to Fight''; ``Trial and Imprisonment''; ``Serving My Country''; ``A Country Not My Own''; and ``Making Peace.'' From these examples, we learn that the peace of mind that came for many COs upon their fateful decision was generally followed by harrowing, often hellish, experiences as local draft boards and law-enforcement agencies routinely insulted, humiliated, and brutalized the men for acting upon dictates of conscience. (It seems that the CO experience has changed little since the WW II days detailed in Charles Shipman's It Had to be Revolution, p. 442.) Those who served in the war in noncombatant roles had different experiences--but usually demeaning ones as well. The process by which many COs, so harshly defined as inadequate and shameful by their fellows, worked their way back to a condition of social acceptance makes for compelling, if uncomfortable, reading. Quiet, simple, disturbing: An invaluable contribution to the cultural history of the 60's.
Choice 评论
Tollefson, himself a conscientious objector during the Vietnam War, has written this book based on in-depth interviews with 40 anomymous men who shared his convictions about that conflict. He does not pretend to have used a scientific sampling in selecting his subjects. Tollefson uses a clever format. Instead of writing a series of separate, individual stories, he organized the book around the major experiences of the conscientious objectors. His purpose, through these highly personal and sometimes emotional accounts, is to understand and convey accurately the experiences of his interviewees. More specifically, he seeks answers to the following: Who were these men? What forces drove them to such extremes of self-sacrifice and isolation? How did it feel to live a life of sustained and principled pacifism? In the end, what he reveals is that the lives of these young men have been changed forever by Vietnam. He makes no judgments, neither praising nor apologizing for nor condemning his interviewees. Good bibliography of secondary sources on conscientious objection. For further reading see Lawrence Baskir and William Strauss's Chance and Circumstance: The Draft, the War, and the Vietnam Generation (CH, Dec'78). All levels. R. E. Marcello; University of North Texas